Tuesday, June 24, 2008

A complete list of things caused by global warming

Here is a complete list of all the things that will get worse because of global warming. From acne to yellow fever, and all on .006 degrees C per year.

http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm

The Global Warming Bubble

Rarely has so much hectoring produced so little.

After all the magazine covers, celebrity sermonizing and U.N.-certified-expert hand-wringing, the fight against global warming got a real-world test in the U.S. Senate a few weeks ago in the debate over a proposal to limit carbon emissions through a cap-and-trade system. After a small dose of the argument, supporters of the proposal couldn't wait to drop it. It was leading opponent Mitch McConnell, the Republican Senate minority leader, who declared he'd be happy to talk about cap-and-trade for a month.

As an indirect tax on carbon, cap-and-trade would increase energy prices when people are already straining under $4-a-gallon gas. Even a political naif -- which McConnell assuredly is not -- would realize the benefit of hanging the proposal around its supporters' necks. Lately, we've seen the tech and housing bubbles burst, and now -- at least as an urgent political issue -- the global warming bubble is getting pricked.

http://townhall.com/columnists/RichLowry/2008/06/19/the_global_warming_bubble

Media Malpractice

Another global warming meltdown.

FTA:THERE IS A SURE-FIRE WAY to make the news these days: Just issue a press release beginning with the words, "New scientific study shows," and have it assert a conclusion that the MSM fervently want to believe--especially if the resulting story would serve to debunk or refute a Bush administration policy. Slam-dunk! Your press release will become news!

You are skeptical, you say? But what other explanation is there for the decision by CBS and MSNBC to post on their websites a ridiculous story about a new scientific "finding" that global warming is causing an increase in the world's earthquakes--an item that was even linked for a time on the Drudge Report.

Now I am not a scientist, but the idea that a few alleged degrees of warming--with none apparently in the last decade--could cause an increase in earthquakes seemed pure quackery to me. So, I decided to perform Google and Yahoo searches of the "scientist" who had issued the finding, one Thomas Chalko, MSc, Ph.D. In less than five minutes I found that Chalko was perhaps the last person who should be quoted on the purported impact of allegedly man-caused global warming.

Chalko is best described as a pseudo-scientist--at least when it comes to the fields of global warming and earthquakes about which he was quoted by CBS and MSNBC as an authority. He is not a meteorologist. Nor is he a geophysicist or seismologist. His website reveals that he is into "self healing," "vibrations," and alien visitations."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/237xqtks.asp

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

More on CFL's

Looking at Fluorescent Bulbs in Different Light

No matter how well-meaning, politicians frequently fail to understand all the consequences of their laws. Real world costs, the costs and benefits faced by those who will actually have to live with the regulations, often elude those who pass these rules. Yet, even by those depressing standards, problems with the mandated that people will soon be forced to use stand out.

The advantages of compact fluorescent light bulbs are obvious. While the fluorescent bulbs can cost 10 times more than incandescent ones, fluorescent bulbs use 75 percent less electricity and last up to 10 times longer.

The EPA has come up with detailed advice on how to deal with how to put bulbs into sockets, cleanup spills, dispose of bulbs, and even safely transport them. For example, drop cloths should be placed on the floor under sockets in case bulbs are dropped, to cushion the fall. But if that fails, the cleanup process becomes incredibly involved.

Read the rest of the article. The clean up instructions are detailed and scary.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,362102,00.html

Carbon Chastity

The First Commandment of the Church of the Environment

Predictions of catastrophe depend on models. Models depend on assumptions about complex planetary systems -- from ocean currents to cloud formation -- that no one fully understands. Which is why the models are inherently flawed and forever changing. The doomsday scenarios posit a cascade of events, each with a certain probability. The multiple improbability of their simultaneous occurrence renders all such predictions entirely speculative.

Yet on the basis of this speculation, environmental activists, attended by compliant scientists and opportunistic politicians, are advocating radical economic and social regulation. "The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity," warns Czech President Vaclav Klaus, "is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism."

If you doubt the arrogance, you haven't seen that Newsweek cover story that declared the global warming debate over.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/29/AR2008052903266.html

Report Finds $45 Trillion Needed to Combat Global Warming

TOKYO — The world needs to invest $45 trillion in energy in coming decades, build some 1,400 nuclear power plants and vastly expand wind power in order to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, according to an energy study released Friday.

The report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency envisions an "energy revolution" that would greatly reduce the world's dependence on fossil fuels while maintaining steady economic growth.

"Meeting this target of 50 percent cut in emissions represents a formidable challenge, and we would require immediate policy action and technological transition on an unprecedented scale," IEA Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,363622,00.html



Is it just me, or does this seem like a monumentally stupid idea?

More on CFL Lightbulbs



Below is a URL which will take some time to open. It's a 5 min clip from a congressman addressing congress regarding the new Light Bulb law. It's crazy but true. Got to wonder what this world is coming too.

Just a note. I found the following quote on a CFL recycling site. "Even though CFL (Compact Florescent Lights) are more energy efficient and last considerably longer than traditional incandescent lights, it's VERY IMPORTANT that they are disposed of properly after they have been used. CFLs contain approximately 5 mg. of mercury. This chemical is contained within the bulb and poses no health risk, but once discarded, broken bulbs have the potential to leak. 5mg of mercury is enough to pollute 4000 gallons of water!"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=e-LOtKIIKcg